Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
LouD
Senior Member
Joined: 11 January 2009
Points: 3898
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 August 2009 at 10:21pm |
I am still hoping for you Sheena that things go naturally for you and very soon!!!! The prob with us Csectioners is not all of us have bodies that recognise that we have had a child in the sense that second pregnancies generally go earlier than first, of course that depends on how far into labour we got etc, and since i basically never really dilated at all in the 18 hours of labour with my first, my body would be doing a VBAC as if it was the first one again.....its just a theory but one that seems to be more often than not.
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
Bobbie
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: North Shore Auckland
Points: 6123
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 August 2009 at 11:44pm |
Exactly Lou! That's why I doubt that if I were left to my own devices I'd have the baby within the required timeframe
|
|
|
LouD
Senior Member
Joined: 11 January 2009
Points: 3898
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 2:38am |
Me either i reckon i would go for a 3 dayer after being 2 weeks over due if i ever went to VBAC!! hence why after 5 days over due and no sign anything to come i decided that i was being an egg, cos im pretty sure no matter wat i went through the outcome would be a csection anyway
But in a way, thank god for csections cos with my history i would definetly been a mother that died during child birth back in the olden days
|
|
Shezamumof3
Senior Member
Joined: 14 April 2007
Points: 10096
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 9:24am |
I got to 9.5cm after 46 hours lol, but that was with no syntocin, I went from 6cm to 9.5 very quicky once the epidural was put in, I must have relaxed enough to dilate.
|
|
|
toniellis
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Kaukapakapa
Points: 1314
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 10:29am |
Sheza thats the main thing aye! You actually DO need to be able to elax to be able to dilate, maybe "relax" is the wrong word LOL but you get what I mean I hope. Personally I think that birth ahs become too medicalised & that is why c-sections seem so necessary. So many OBs give you all the "what ifs" of how a VBAC can turn out bad but there is VERY little info about the "What ifs" of a c-section, they always seem to gloss over it. How many of you know that for EVERY c-section you have there is a good chance your bladder or other internal organs can fuse to each other during recovery & healing? Any subsequent pregnancies are then in danger of causing internal rupture.
I have had two c-sections & for me they were BOTH unnecessary. #3 was such a blissful home waterbirth that I cannot imagine doing it any different if I was to have another baby (which I'm not LOL!).
I was in my own home, I was relaxed enough to dilated very quickly & pushed my baby out & it was an experience that was just perfect! My only regret was no pictues during the actual birth. Just over 4.5hours from first contraction to baby pushed out & then I was able to tell my OB to stick his c-section ideas up his bum.
C-sections are wonderful if medically necessary but how many of you have unknowingly been pointed towards an elective c-section when a subsequent birth could have been done naturally?
|
Mum to Alex (11), Blaire (10) & Erika (8) and Damien (6)
Successful HWB VBA2Cs! Soon to be surrogate
|
|
Bobbie
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: North Shore Auckland
Points: 6123
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 10:41am |
My OB and MW were always upfront about the risks of both though being breech I wasn't given an option to VBAC anyway.
I did know about the fusing - one of the reasons I've gone with the OB I have because he also specialises in bladder reconstruction so I figure he knows his way around there better than most (although of course I guess it comes down to how the actual patient heals)
|
|
|
tishy
Senior Member
Joined: 17 August 2007
Location: Wellington
Points: 3941
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 1:58pm |
Chickielou wrote:
But in a way, thank god for csections cos with my history i would definetly been a mother that died during child birth back in the olden days |
This reminds me of the conversation we had with our OB (who has very unique mannerisms and english is not his native tongue) when we asked him to explain why he was suggesting a c-section.
"100 years ago, Mothers died, and that was ok"
"20 years ago, babies died, and that was ok"
"These days, people expect live babies!"
And then explained the risk to Aoife The poor registrar behind him was cringing.
Luckily for him both me and DH have a similar sense of humour.
|
|
cuppatea
Senior Member
Joined: 05 February 2007
Points: 7798
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 3:43pm |
Sheena I was told they would give synoticin (sp?) as they don't want you to be in labour for too long so will speed things up. In actual fact just before my mw checked me and found i was 10cm we were having the "we will try the drip but looks like we might have to bypass the vagina" conversation (at this point I had been labouring for 12 hours and things had been going slowly, but amazing I had actually gone from 4-10cm in under 2 hours which shocked us both a little). They don't like to do the gel though. I don't really know much about induction having never had one so maybe it's different giving the drip if you've gone in to labour naturally?
Each hospital is different as well, I was told I could birth Spencer naturally if I wanted (he was breech) but that they strongly advised me not to as he was my first and they had no idea if he could fit out. I then looked up all the options and decided that in this instance c/s was safest (for him, not necessarily me). Turns out he should of been able to come out as Kyle did and he was huge compared to Spencer (head 2cm bigger than Spencer and nearly 2lb more).
I also was not monitored continuously and they let me labour for 14 hours and push for over 2, they used the vontouse in the end because I was in immense pain but if it wasn't for that they were gonna let me keep pushing (the pain was from his shoulder not anything to do with scar). So it really does depend on the medical people around, on their confidence to do a VBAC, there philosophy on it and so forth, and also your mindset, I went into it knowing that I might not get a great outcome and also that I could, if need be, ask to go to surgery, even whilst in labour.
And yep I am pleased we live in a time when they are available and not just available but very safe (on the whole)
|
|
|
Paws
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Auckland
Points: 5860
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 7:03pm |
toniellis wrote:
Sheza thats the main thing aye! You actually DO need to be able to elax to be able to dilate, maybe "relax" is the wrong word LOL but you get what I mean I hope. Personally I think that birth ahs become too medicalised & that is why c-sections seem so necessary. So many OBs give you all the "what ifs" of how a VBAC can turn out bad but there is VERY little info about the "What ifs" of a c-section, they always seem to gloss over it. How many of you know that for EVERY c-section you have there is a good chance your bladder or other internal organs can fuse to each other during recovery & healing? Any subsequent pregnancies are then in danger of causing internal rupture.
I have had two c-sections & for me they were BOTH unnecessary. #3 was such a blissful home waterbirth that I cannot imagine doing it any different if I was to have another baby (which I'm not LOL!).
I was in my own home, I was relaxed enough to dilated very quickly & pushed my baby out & it was an experience that was just perfect! My only regret was no pictues during the actual birth. Just over 4.5hours from first contraction to baby pushed out & then I was able to tell my OB to stick his c-section ideas up his bum.
C-sections are wonderful if medically necessary but how many of you have unknowingly been pointed towards an elective c-section when a subsequent birth could have been done naturally? |
OMG I so agree with this!! it bugs me that there is the automatic assumption that once you have had one c-section you'll only have c-sections afterwards.
I really am hoping I can have a VBAC and hubby has agreed to not discount the possibility of a homebirth VBAC (and can I say that I totally blame you and your inspiring story amount several others!!!)
|
|
|
toniellis
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Kaukapakapa
Points: 1314
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 August 2009 at 4:09pm |
LOL Paws!!!
I like to hope that it is something that people will take as encouragement. My home VBA2Cs was AMAZING & just proves how easy birth really should be. I only pushed for 18 minutes which was brilliant for the first time pushing a baby out! There would have to be a very good reason for me to EVER go back to a hospital again to give birth (not that I am having anymore!) as it is just human nature to "interfere". I fully blame the hospital environment for my first two c-sections. Especially for Blaire's birth.
|
Mum to Alex (11), Blaire (10) & Erika (8) and Damien (6)
Successful HWB VBA2Cs! Soon to be surrogate
|
|
Paws
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Auckland
Points: 5860
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 August 2009 at 5:15pm |
toniellis wrote:
LOL Paws!!!
I like to hope that it is something that people will take as encouragement. . |
Well you can be assured it has encouraged me....and the good news is I'm looking good for VBAC...I have a midwife who appears to be THE bomb! She was even good for a HBAC but there is a small concern around my meds effect on baby but we can compromise more than likely and use Birthcare instead.
|
|
|
lilfatty
Senior Member
Joined: 22 August 2007
Location: Waitakere
Points: 9799
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2009 at 2:38pm |
I have my bladder, bowel and uterus fused together and the uterus was in the middle from cs number one hence the surgeons strong recommendation to not have anymore kids.
Edited by lilfatty
|
Mummy to Issy (3) and Elias (18 months)
I did it .. 41 kgs gone! From flab to fab in under a year LFs weight blog
|
|
ElfsMum
Senior Member
Joined: 04 June 2007
Location: Christchurch
Points: 11702
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2009 at 6:31pm |
|
Mum to two amazing boys!
|
|
lilfatty
Senior Member
Joined: 22 August 2007
Location: Waitakere
Points: 9799
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 August 2009 at 7:45pm |
KA - I didnt notice any pains other than what I would have called "normal" pregnancy pangs.
I knew I had something funny going on with my bladder though, but thats just because its moved really high up into my torso (although I didnt know that at the time, the surgeon told me after she opened me up and saw the placement of things).
|
Mummy to Issy (3) and Elias (18 months)
I did it .. 41 kgs gone! From flab to fab in under a year LFs weight blog
|
|
ElfsMum
Senior Member
Joined: 04 June 2007
Location: Christchurch
Points: 11702
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 August 2009 at 11:30am |
yeah I've had what feels like bladder and bowel moving and uncomfy and causing stomach soreness..
|
Mum to two amazing boys!
|
|
Bizzy
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 10974
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 August 2009 at 3:32pm |
toniellis wrote:
How many of you know that for EVERY c-section you have there is a good chance your bladder or other internal organs can fuse to each other during recovery & healing? |
i for one certainly didnt know that! i know that things dont feel the same in that dept any more and i never expected that either!
|
|
Bobbie
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: North Shore Auckland
Points: 6123
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 August 2009 at 7:59pm |
To play devil's advocate here - you can have some pretty horrific tearing and after effects from a standard vaginal birth too.
Also I have heard that as a general rule emergency C's do a lot more damage than electives.
Though I think it's great to be well informed
Edited by Bobbie
|
|
|
LeahandJoel
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Tauranga
Points: 1414
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 August 2009 at 8:03pm |
[QUOTE=Bobbie]To play devil's advocate here - you can have some pretty horrific tearing and after effects from a standard vaginal birth too.
Yup....had more stitches with my VBAC than with my CS and other delightful things from pushing as well!
|
|
|
Shezamumof3
Senior Member
Joined: 14 April 2007
Points: 10096
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 September 2009 at 9:27pm |
I was so worried that id have some damage in there or lots of scar tissue from my emergency CS, but the surgen said that I had very little scar tissue etc and that it was a straigh forward elective, phew,
I have some wicked brusing this time though Im taking arnica for that though.
|
|
|
lilfatty
Senior Member
Joined: 22 August 2007
Location: Waitakere
Points: 9799
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 September 2009 at 9:46am |
I had huge bruising after this one .. It was like someone had biffed a softball at my belly! (I think it was from the clamps)
|
Mummy to Issy (3) and Elias (18 months)
I did it .. 41 kgs gone! From flab to fab in under a year LFs weight blog
|
|